What quota of these statements can you render in the linguistic style appropriate to orthodox, non-complicated Anglican Plain English?
All articles that coruscate with resplendence are not truly auriferous.
Sorting on the part of mendicants must be interdicted.
Masculine cadavers are incapable of rendering testimony.
A revolving lithic conglomerate accumulates no congeries of small, green, biophytic plant.
Members of an avian species of identical plumage tend to congregate.
Pulchritude possesses solely cutaneous profundity.
Freedom from incrustations of grime is proximal to rectitude.
It is fruitless to become lachrymose of precipitately departed lacteal fluid.
Eschew the implement of correction and vitiate the scion.
The stylus is more potent than the rapier.
It is fruitless to attempt to indoctrinate a superannuated canine with innovative manoeuvres.
Surveillance should precede saltation.
Scintillate, scintillate, minute, globular, stellar.
The person presenting the ultimate cachinnation possesses thereby the optimal cachinnation.
Exclusive dedication to necessitous chores without interludes of hedonistic diversion renders Jack a hebetudinous fellow.
Individuals who make their abodes in vitreous edifices would be advised to refrain from catapulting petrious projectiles.
Where there are visible vapours having their provenance in ignited carbonaceous materials, there is conflagration.
No remittance is given for actions which are taken counter to the codified body of jurisprudence.